BBC News

Why does Amazon have no Western rivals?

Why does Amazon have no Western rivals?

Why Amazon Faces No Significant Competition in the West

Vitamins, repair tape, and a jar of mango chutney represent just a fraction of the items my household purchased last month through Amazon’s extensive online marketplace. Our engagement with the company extends far beyond simple purchases; we have shopped at its Whole Foods supermarkets, streamed its original television series, read books on Kindle devices, and utilized countless websites that likely rely on Amazon Web Services (AWS), its highly lucrative cloud-computing division. This interconnected ecosystem of products and services is vast. Earlier this year, the global giant surpassed US retail titan Walmart to claim the title of the world’s largest company by annual revenue.

Given this dominance, questions arise regarding the lack of serious Western rivals in the e-commerce sector. Jeff Bezos launched Amazon in 1995 as an online bookstore from a rented garage. Why, nearly three decades later, is there so little competition? Surely, consumers would benefit from a more competitive market landscape.

However, Amazon is not without challengers across the various sectors it occupies. In the United States, major retailers such as Walmart and Target operate expansive, rapidly growing online retail divisions and offer subscription services akin to Amazon Prime. In the United Kingdom, Tesco leads the online grocery market, while Zalando is the premier internet retailer of apparel in Germany. Furthermore, Chinese platforms Temu and Shein have emerged as significant forces in the ultra-low-price segment.

Another key player is eBay, which recently received a $55.5 billion (£41 billion) acquisition proposal from video game retailer GameStop, a deal eBay subsequently rejected. eBay operates on a distinct business model centered on auctions, second-hand items, and collectibles. Although GameStop expressed hopes that eBay could evolve into a stronger competitor to Amazon, the latter currently holds a commanding lead in total e-commerce market share. According to recent data, Amazon controls 40.5% of all online retail sales in the US, compared to Walmart’s 9.2% and eBay’s roughly 3%. Amazon’s dominance is similarly pronounced in the UK, where it captures approximately 30% of online retail sales.

"Amazon is not an undisputed monopolist in e-commerce, but it is the dominant firm," notes Annabelle Gawer, director of the Centre of Digital Economy at the University of Surrey. "And the scope of what it sells is unparalleled."

Experts identify several factors that have made Amazon exceptionally difficult to compete with. A primary advantage is its "first-mover" status. Among the earliest to scale online retail, Amazon possessed a clear vision of how the internet could transform shopping through convenience and speed, allowing it to capture market share more rapidly than many competitors.

Equally critical was the long-term willingness of its shareholders to tolerate losses. For years, the company sold products below cost and aggressively reinvested early profits into business growth. To this day, Amazon has never issued a dividend to shareholders. "[The strategy] constrained the competition," explains David Yoffie, professor emeritus at Harvard Business School (HBS). He notes that traditional companies pursuing such a strategy would have seen their stock prices plummet and shareholders become disgruntled.

Currently, Amazon leverages funds from its most profitable ventures—primarily AWS, its main profit engine—to support its lower-margin retail operations and finance new initiatives. Its positioning as a technology firm has also been advantageous. Algorithms, automation, and data analytics have been central to Amazon’s ability to scale, enhancing efficiency and refining the customer experience.

Sunil Gupta, another Harvard Business School professor, highlights the company’s culture of bold experimentation. Amazon has entered diverse fields ranging from cloud computing and consumer electronics to private-label goods, original content production, and healthcare, exiting ventures that do not succeed.

Experts also point to two pivotal strategic shifts. The first, implemented in 2000, marked Amazon’s transition from a pure online retailer to an online platform, enabling third-party sellers to utilize its infrastructure.


Source: BBC News Generated at: 2026-05-18 07:25:14 UTC

Related Articles

Bloomberg

Trump to Keep Audit Immunity, Pulte Named New Acting DNI, More

Trump retains audit immunity, and Pulte is appointed Acting DNI.

Bloomberg

Stock Movers: HPE, Victoria's Secret, Shake Shack (Podcast)

Bloomberg’s podcast highlights market movers HPE, Victoria’s Secret, and Shake Shack, analyzing their recent stock perfo...

Bloomberg

Balance of Power: Trump Aims to Calm Lebanon Tensions (Podcast)

Bloomberg podcast discusses Trump’s efforts to de-escalate tensions in Lebanon, aiming to restore regional stability thr...

Bloomberg

Trump Audit Immunity Intact, Pulte Named Acting DNI, More

Trump’s audit immunity remains intact, and Pulte has been named acting Director of National Intelligence.

Google Needs More Money
Bloomberg

Google Needs More Money

Google unveiled new AI tools and a revamped search interface at its 2026 I/O conference, reinforcing its multi-billion-d...

Reuters

IEA forecasts chance of critically low stockpiles before peak summer demand

The IEA warns of critically low stockpiles before peak summer demand. This forecast highlights potential energy shortage...