BBC News

Why does Amazon have no Western rivals?

Why does Amazon have no Western rivals?

Title: The Unrivaled Dominance of Amazon in the West

From essential vitamins and repair tape to a jar of mango chutney, my household recently procured a variety of goods through Amazon’s expansive digital marketplace. Our engagement with the company extends far beyond simple purchases; we have utilized its Whole Foods supermarkets, streamed its original television programming, read via Kindle devices, and likely accessed numerous websites that rely on its lucrative Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud infrastructure. This interconnected ecosystem represents only a fraction of the services offered by the global giant, which recently surpassed Walmart to claim the title of the world’s largest company by annual revenue. Yet, the question remains: why has Jeff Bezos’s 1995 startup, which began as a garage-based online bookstore, encountered so few formidable competitors in the Western e-commerce landscape? Wouldn't greater market competition benefit consumers?

It is important to note that Amazon does face competition across its various sectors. In the United States, major retailers such as Walmart and Target have significantly expanded their online retail capabilities and introduced their own subscription models akin to Amazon Prime. In the United Kingdom, Tesco dominates the online grocery sector, while Zalando leads in German online apparel. Furthermore, Chinese platforms Temu and Shein have emerged as powerful contenders in the ultra-low-cost segment. Additionally, eBay, which recently declined a $55.5 billion (£41 billion) acquisition offer from video game retailer GameStop, operates with a distinct business model focused on auctions, second-hand items, and collectibles. Although GameStop expressed hope that eBay could eventually challenge Amazon, the latter currently holds a commanding lead in total e-commerce market share. According to recent data, Amazon controls 40.5% of US online retail sales, compared to Walmart’s 9.2% and eBay’s mere 3%. Amazon’s dominance is similarly pronounced in the UK, where it captures approximately 30% of online retail transactions.

"Amazon is not an undisputed monopolist in e-commerce, but it is the dominant firm," observes Annabelle Gawer, director of the University of Surrey’s Centre of Digital Economy. "And the scope of what it sells is unparalleled."

Experts attribute Amazon’s difficulty to rival by a convergence of strategic factors. A primary driver is its 'first-mover' advantage. By being among the first to scale online retail and possessing a clear vision of how the internet could transform shopping through convenience and speed, Amazon secured market share more rapidly than its peers. Equally critical was the long-term patience of its shareholders, who permitted the company to operate at a loss by selling products below cost, and later allowed aggressive reinvestment of early profits to fuel expansion. To this day, Amazon has never distributed dividends to shareholders.

"This strategy constrained the competition," explains David Yoffie, professor emeritus at Harvard Business School (HBS). He notes that traditional firms pursuing such a model would have suffered severe stock price declines and shareholder unrest. Today, Amazon leverages funds from its most profitable ventures—primarily AWS, its main engine of profit—to support its lower-margin retail operations and finance new initiatives.

Furthermore, Amazon’s self-identification as a technology company has been instrumental. The integration of algorithms, automation, and data analytics has been central to its scaling capabilities, enhancing efficiency and defining the customer experience. Sunil Gupta, another HBS professor, highlights the company’s culture of bold experimentation, citing its expansion into cloud computing, consumer devices, private-label products, original content, and healthcare, along with its willingness to abandon ventures that fail. Experts also identify two pivotal strategic shifts as key to this dominance. The first, implemented in 2000, marked Amazon’s transition from a pure online retailer to an online platform, enabling third-party


Source: BBC News Generated at: 2026-05-18 07:25:14 UTC

Related Articles

Bloomberg

Court Lets Alabama Use GOP Map, Trump Payout Fund Dropped, More

A court approved Alabama’s GOP congressional map, while a fund linked to Trump’s payouts was terminated.

Bloomberg

Trump $1.8B Fund Dropped, Reuters: SpaceX Seeks $75B in IPO

SpaceX targets a $75B IPO while a Trump-backed $1.8B fund is shelved.

Supreme Court Lets Alabama Use Republican-Friendly US House Map
Bloomberg

Supreme Court Lets Alabama Use Republican-Friendly US House Map

The Supreme Court allowed Alabama to keep its Republican-leaning House map, rejecting Voting Rights Act challenges. This...

Hundreds of Flights Halted as Typhoon Jangmi Nears Tokyo
Bloomberg

Hundreds of Flights Halted as Typhoon Jangmi Nears Tokyo

Typhoon Jangmi’s approach to Tokyo has forced the suspension of hundreds of flights. Aviation authorities grounded trave...

Bloomberg

Blanche $1.8B Fund Scrapped, Pulte Named Acting Spy Chief, More

A $1.8B fund was scrapped, and Pulte was named acting spy chief.

Reuters

GameStop reports 14% rise in quarterly revenue, unveils $2 billion share buyback

GameStop reported a 14% quarterly revenue increase and announced a $2 billion share buyback program.