Backlash over Department for Education videos with Gemma Collins
Controversy Erupts Over Department for Educationâs Partnership with Gemma Collins
The Department for Education (DfE) is facing intense criticism following the release of social media videos featuring reality television personality Gemma Collins, who was enlisted to promote post-16 educational opportunities. The controversy has drawn ire from both critics of the governmentâs handling of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provision and members of the public who question the appropriateness of the collaboration.
Collins stars in several clips on the DfEâs official channels, most notably participating in a conversation with Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson. The move has sparked a polarized reaction. While Phillipson dismissed some of the harsh feedback as "outright snobbery and just downright unpleasant," she defended the partnership by highlighting Collinsâs significant digital influence, noting that the star possesses a reach that "politicians can't reach."
The disparity in audience size is stark. Collins, known for her appearances on The Only Way Is Essex, Celebrity Big Brother, Iâm a Celebrity... Get Me Out of Here!, Celebrity MasterChef, Celebs Go Dating, and Dancing on Ice, commands 2.3 million Instagram followers. This figure vastly outstrips the DfEâs 85,000 followers and Phillipsonâs 19,000.
The DfE has maintained that the initiative is focused on "transforming post-16 education" and "supporting the aspirations of young people who want high quality vocational courses." According to the BBC, Collins agreed to the collaboration to showcase alternative pathways for students who do not view university as the ideal route. Collins herself declined to provide a comment.
The videos include scenes of Collins entering DfE offices to the soundtrack of The Devil Wears Prada, where she asks, "Right, what are we doing to help the children?" She is also seen discussing vocational training and her fondness for King Richard III with the Education Secretary. Amidst growing concerns regarding government expenditure on influencers, the DfE posted on Instagram: "GC wasn't paid. The two had a great chat about the education system. Stay tuned."
Although the videos did not explicitly address SEND issues, the timing and content have provoked strong reactions from advocacy groups. Aimee Bradley, a campaigner who runs SEND Sanctuary UK and has three autistic children, has called for an apology. Bradley, who is currently awaiting a tribunal regarding her sonâs school placement and participated in a recent consultation on SEND reforms in England, described the celebrity content as "honestly sickening."
"Some parents are literally grieving children lost after years of unmet need, school trauma, mental health collapse, and systemic failure," Bradley told BBC News. She argued that the department could have involved individuals with "greater care and understanding," stating, "It felt like a joke on us parents... there needs to be an apology for us parents, who are literally just fighting for our lives."
Other advocates have echoed these sentiments. Amy White, a parent of a child with SEND, criticized the campaign for failing to "read the room." She argued that featuring a reality star without "lived or professional experience supporting children with SEND" creates a disconnect from the daily realities of families. "The Department for Education appears to think promoting pantomime-style reels is somehow going to reassure parents that they are acting in our childrenâs best interests," White said. "It is frightening. It is insensitive. And for many families, it feels downright insulting."
Not all reactions have been negative. Teacher Russell Clarke offered a counter-perspective to the BBC, suggesting that while criticizing the choice of Collins is "easy," there is logic behind the strategy. He noted that engaging young people on social media often requires using figures they already follow, as they are unlikely to interact with the DfE directly. However, he warned that the approach carries the risk of "blurring" the core message.
Source: BBC News Generated at: 2026-05-20 18:42:37 UTC




