BBC News

As Starmer faces war overseas, his party can't find peace at home

As Starmer faces war overseas, his party can't find peace at home

Title: While Starmer Confronts Foreign Conflict, Labour’s Domestic Stability Remains Elusive

The traditional British political norm of rallying together during times of international peril appears to have fractured in 2026. In the past, administrations commanding substantial majorities enjoyed considerable autonomy to act as they saw fit; today, that era of political cohesion has passed. Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour party remains deeply unsettled, with internal tensions continuing to unravel even against the backdrop of a massive crisis in the Middle East.

"There is a lot of anxiety around," one minister admitted, noting that it is unclear whether the public retains significant trust in politicians’ capacity to prioritize and safeguard citizens from what the head of the International Energy Agency has described as potentially "the greatest global energy security threat in history."

Furthermore, it is uncertain if the government commands sufficient public backing to deepen UK involvement in the conflict, particularly following the decision to permit the United States to utilize British bases for strikes on Iranian facilities targeting the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint. With local elections just weeks away, millions of voters will have the opportunity to signal their confidence—or lack thereof—in the political class. Polls indicate the results will likely be chaotic rather than orderly, reflecting a messy political landscape.

While Prime Minister Starmer grapples with a war he neither initiated nor possesses the authority to conclude, some of his own Members of Parliament are complicating his efforts. This internal friction is exemplified by the return of former deputy Angela Rayner to the public spotlight over recent weeks. Rayner is among a group of Labour MPs opposing Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s proposals. This faction is reportedly considering forcing a vote in the House of Commons unless Mahmood withdraws certain elements of her plan, most notably the proposal to extend the waiting period for indefinite leave to remain from five to ten years for most migrants.

Sources close to the Home Secretary maintain that a tougher stance on immigration aligns with public sentiment. These insiders remain steadfast despite discomfort among Labour colleagues, asserting that more voters have defected to the Reform party due to perceived weakness in immigration policy than have moved to the Greens because of harshness. Following the previous failure of welfare reforms, which encountered stiff resistance in the Commons, Mahmood intends to implement her desired changes gradually through various mechanisms, avoiding a single legislative moment that might allow critics to coalesce for a major confrontation.

However, ministers are wary of the risks and the perception such infighting creates. One official cautioned colleagues against picking fights while the Iran conflict persists, urging them to "take a deep breath and focus on the reward we could get with unanimity." Another frustrated source characterized the discord as "classic fighting amongst ourselves when we should be focusing on the world and trying to govern."

The dispute escalated significantly when Angela Rayner intervened, not merely debating technicalities in the Commons but delivering a speech in London where she accused ministers of advancing proposals that were "un-British." She added that the "survival of the Labour Party is at stake" and that the party was "running out of time."

Some colleagues have reacted with irritation, suggesting it is hypocritical for Rayner—who is under investigation for potential tax liabilities—to "lectur[e] Keir on British values." Others view her recent speeches and City engagements as preparation for a leadership challenge after the May elections, a scenario many deem likely if Labour suffers heavy defeats. Given the current geopolitical turmoil, discussions of leadership contests strike many as self-indulgent. Nevertheless, the war has effectively pushed Labour’s internal squabbles off the front pages, providing some...


Source: BBC News Generated at: 2026-03-21 11:27:14 UTC

Related Articles

Stoltenberg: Oljefondet trenger teknologigantene
Bloomberg

Stoltenberg: Oljefondet trenger teknologigantene

In a Bloomberg interview, Jens Stoltenberg stated that tech giants are essential for Norway’s oil fund, emphasizing thei...

Bloomberg

France Moves Closer to Passing Bill to Help Its Food Industry

France nears passing emergency legislation to boost domestic livestock farming and reduce food imports, aiming to restor...

White House Correspondents Reschedule Dinner, Bolster Security
Bloomberg

White House Correspondents Reschedule Dinner, Bolster Security

President Trump and VP Vance were evacuated from the WHCA dinner due to a security incident. The event was rescheduled w...

Norway’s $2.3 Trillion Fund Needs to Stay Invested in Big Tech, Stoltenberg Says
Bloomberg

Norway’s $2.3 Trillion Fund Needs to Stay Invested in Big Tech, Stoltenberg Says

Stoltenberg argues Norway’s $2.3 trillion sovereign wealth fund must maintain heavy exposure to big tech. He emphasized ...

Here Are Key Trump Officials Who Have Left the Administration
Bloomberg

Here Are Key Trump Officials Who Have Left the Administration

Prominent officials have departed the Trump administration, as depicted in a 2025 White House cabinet session. This list...

Bloomberg

Stoltenberg Weighs In on US-NATO Tensions, Wealth Fund

Stoltenberg criticized Trump’s threats to Denmark over Greenland as "unacceptable," noting rising US-NATO tensions. He h...