Global News Digest

arXiv

When Do Attention Circuits Form? Developmental Trajectories of Capability and Attention-Sink Emergence Across Three 1B-ClassArchitectures

Title: Tracing the Emergence of Attention Circuits: Developmental Pathways in Capability and Attention-Sink Formation Across Three 1B-Scale Architectures

Abstract: This study maps the developmental trajectory of attention-head circuit formation across three 1B-class language models, encompassing two architectural families (dense transformers and mixture-of-experts) and two pretraining datasets (The Pile and DCLM): Pythia 1B, OLMo 1B-0724-hf, and OLMoE 1B-7B-0924. We conducted 30 mechanistic-interpretability runs in total, applying a participation-ratio (PR) spectral signal and an all-head capability-specific selectivity screen at each of 10 log-spaced checkpoints per model. This approach allowed us to monitor the emergence of induction, previous-token, and BOS-attractor heads. Our analysis yields five key findings. First (F1), Layers 0 and 1 consistently produce zero BOS-classified heads across all revisions and models, indicating that this "L0/L1 zero-BOS floor" is an inherent architectural feature rather than a learned result. Second (F2), the fraction of whole-model BOS-attractors exhibits three distinct emergence patterns: a gradual ramp in Pythia 1B, a sharp phase transition in OLMo 1B (jumping from 7% to 70% between adjacent checkpoints), and a gradual ramp in OLMoE 1B-7B. Third (F3), in models trained on DCLM, the formation of induction circuits precedes that of BOS-attractors by a factor of 10 to 20 in terms of token count. Furthermore, capability-circuit formation and attention-sink formation represent two separate transitions rather than a single event. Fourth (F4), the capability-specific screen identifies the final induction circuit within just 0.3% to 2% of total training tokens, demonstrating that circuit identification does not necessitate access to the final model. Fifth (F5), for every final-checkpoint induction head sampled across the three models, the per-head PR was elevated at or before the first revision where the head crossed its capability-selectivity threshold. These results refine the understanding of the induction phase transition: in 1B-class models trained on DCLM, the induction transition and the attention-sink transition are separated by an order of magnitude in token count and display qualitatively different shapes.


Source: arXiv Generated at: 2026-06-02 00:00:00 UTC

Related Articles

Schroders Renewable Unit Targets AI Assets as Power Demand Soars
Bloomberg

Schroders Renewable Unit Targets AI Assets as Power Demand Soars

Schroders’ renewable unit targets AI infrastructure, pivoting to meet soaring energy demand from artificial intelligence...

State Street's Paglia on SBI Group Partnership, ETFs
Bloomberg

State Street's Paglia on SBI Group Partnership, ETFs

State Street's Paglia discusses the SBI Group partnership and ETFs, but the source text is missing. Please provide the a...

Nvidia Boss Says Workers Should Be Paid ‘as Much as Possible’
Bloomberg

Nvidia Boss Says Workers Should Be Paid ‘as Much as Possible’

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang advocates for paying workers “as much as possible,” emphasizing maximum compensation. This stanc...

TSE Talking With Regulator For Easing ETF Listing Rules
Bloomberg

TSE Talking With Regulator For Easing ETF Listing Rules

The Tokyo Stock Exchange is discussing with regulators to ease ETF listing rules. This aims to simplify market access an...

S&P DJI CEO on Japan Markets, Mega IPOs
Bloomberg

S&P DJI CEO on Japan Markets, Mega IPOs

S&P DJI CEO discusses Japan's financial markets and major IPOs.