arXiv

Proof-Carrying Agent Actions: Model-Agnostic Runtime Governance for Heterogeneous Agent Systems

Title: Proof-Carrying Agent Actions: Model-Agnostic Runtime Governance for Heterogeneous Agent Systems

Abstract:

Agent systems operate through runtimes that feature vastly different control points, ranging from local coding tools and framework SDKs to managed agent platforms, API gateways, and observer-only integrations. Consequently, a high-risk action, such as publishing data externally, might manifest as a shell command in one environment, a tool call in another, and a hosted session transition in a third. This fragmentation complicates the consistent resolution of fundamental governance questions: determining exactly what action was authorized, by whom, under which approval semantics, and with what evidence post-execution.

To address this, we introduce Proof-Carrying Agent Actions (PCAA), a runtime-neutral governance model that prioritizes an action certificate over vendor-native session records. PCAA structures control around five distinct checkpoints: pre-action admissibility, action open, assumption capture, approval, and outcome closure. These checkpoints are anchored to a portable action envelope that includes runtime and approval receipts, as well as replay-ready proof. The model is further enhanced in two practical dimensions: the certificate is designed to be externality-aware, incorporating boundary facts like destination visibility and account provenance; additionally, approval is defined by explicit enforceability classes rather than a binary reviewed/unreviewed status.

We evaluate the model through a reference implementation within a heterogeneous agent control plane and a disclosure-bounded evaluation protocol. Testing on a protected benchmark, expanded from 24 executable seeds to 96 traces across four runtime families, demonstrates that PCAA maintains route quality while revealing distinct failure modes during ablation studies. This work provides a systems formulation of runtime governance centered on certificate-bearing actions and offers an implementation-grounded perspective on how such a framework can remain portable amidst runtime changes without devolving into vendor-specific control surfaces.


Source: arXiv Generated at: 2026-06-04 00:00:00 UTC

Related Articles

SpaceX Seeks to Raise $75 Billion in Record IPO (Video)
Bloomberg

SpaceX Seeks to Raise $75 Billion in Record IPO (Video)

SpaceX aims for a record $75 billion valuation through an initial public offering. This historic IPO marks a significant...

Broadcom AI Chip Outlook Disappoints Investors
Bloomberg

Broadcom AI Chip Outlook Disappoints Investors

Broadcom’s AI chip projections disappointed investors, dampening market sentiment. The outlook fell short of expectation...

Hiranandani Group CEO on Powering India's Digital Future
Bloomberg

Hiranandani Group CEO on Powering India's Digital Future

Hiranandani Group CEO discusses driving India's digital transformation.

Cerebras Says It’s Working With All AI Gear Makers Except Nvidia
Bloomberg

Cerebras Says It’s Working With All AI Gear Makers Except Nvidia

Cerebras confirmed partnerships with all major AI hardware vendors except Nvidia. This broad engagement positions Cerebr...

Putin Turns Russia’s AI Future Into a Kremlin Family Business
Bloomberg

Putin Turns Russia’s AI Future Into a Kremlin Family Business

Putin is consolidating Russia’s AI ambitions into a Kremlin family business, effectively turning the sector into a dynas...

Reuters

Meta repeatedly pushes back new AI model release for developers, WSJ says

Meta has repeatedly delayed the release of its new AI model for developers, according to the WSJ. This ongoing postponem...