arXiv

Rethinking Sales Lead Scoring with LLM-based Hierarchical Preference Ranking

Title: Reimagining Sales Lead Scoring via LLM-Driven Hierarchical Preference Ranking

Abstract

The process of converting sales leads in high-stakes sectors, such as the automotive and real estate industries, is fundamentally distinct from e-commerce recommendation systems. This divergence stems from extended decision-making cycles and complex, multi-stage sales funnels. Conventional lead scoring techniques—ranging from rule-based scorecards and machine learning algorithms to pointwise Click-Through Rate (CTR) models—struggle with significant hurdles. These include sparse supervision signals, a semantic disconnect when processing unstructured Customer Relationship Management (CRM) logs, and a general inability to accurately capture the relative priority of leads.

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) provide superior semantic comprehension of customer interactions, standard, general-purpose LLMs are poorly equipped for lead ranking. They are designed to generate text rather than produce comparable scores and fail to align with the hierarchical priorities inherent in sales funnels. To address this, we present an LLM-based discriminative framework for sales lead scoring that facilitates the joint modeling of structured CRM data and unstructured customer interactions.

Building upon this foundation, we introduce HPRO (Hierarchical Preference Ranking Optimization). This approach enhances sales lead scoring by incorporating a hierarchical preference ranking objective. HPRO utilizes a margin-aware Bradley-Terry formulation to convert sparse binary labels into dense, funnel-aware preference pairs. This mechanism allows lead scoring to benefit from both pointwise and pairwise supervision.

Our experiments, conducted on large-scale data from a prominent New Energy Vehicle (NEV) brand, reveal state-of-the-art results in both classification (achieving an AUC of 0.8161) and ranking performance, which saw a 39.7% increase in precision among the top-ranked leads. Furthermore, a 132-day online A/B test confirmed a 9.5% uplift in sales volume, validating the model’s real-world commercial impact.


Source: arXiv Generated at: 2026-06-04 00:00:00 UTC

Related Articles

Shark Tank Star Shrinks Data Center Footprint After Backlash
Bloomberg

Shark Tank Star Shrinks Data Center Footprint After Backlash

After public backlash, a Shark Tank entrepreneur reduced the size of a Utah data center project. This decision followed ...

Hatch’s New Bedside Sleep Clock Wirelessly Tracks Sleep Quality
Bloomberg

Hatch’s New Bedside Sleep Clock Wirelessly Tracks Sleep Quality

Hatch’s $250 screen-free sleep clock wirelessly tracks breathing, heart rate, and movement using low-power signals, offe...

Anduril's Stephens on Innovating in an Age of War
Bloomberg

Anduril's Stephens on Innovating in an Age of War

At Bloomberg Tech 2026, Anduril’s Stephens discussed AI’s role in defense and military innovation amid global conflict.

Liftoff Mobile CEO Talks IPO, Advertising and Strategy
Bloomberg

Liftoff Mobile CEO Talks IPO, Advertising and Strategy

Liftoff Mobile’s CEO discusses IPO plans, navigating ad market trends, and outlining the company's strategic direction f...

Samsung Sponsor Spotlight
Bloomberg

Samsung Sponsor Spotlight

The request lacks source text for the "Samsung Sponsor Spotlight" article. Please provide the original content to enable...

AI Isn’t Replacing Credit Hedge Fund Traders Yet, Barclays Says
Bloomberg

AI Isn’t Replacing Credit Hedge Fund Traders Yet, Barclays Says

Barclays states AI hasn’t replaced credit hedge fund traders yet. Human expertise remains vital for complex decisions, m...