arXiv

Toward Pre-Deployment Assurance for Enterprise AI Agents: Ontology-Grounded Simulation and Trust Certification

Title: Ensuring Enterprise AI Reliability Before Deployment: A Framework for Ontology-Based Simulation and Trust Certification

Abstract:

A significant disconnect persists between benchmarking large language model (LLM) capabilities and their actual production deployment, specifically regarding the pre-deployment verification of enterprise AI agents. Once these agents are live, traditional safeguards such as post-deployment monitoring, human-in-the-loop oversight, and prompt-level guardrails provide insufficient assurance. To address this, we introduce a verification framework rooted in ontology that integrates three core elements: an "Agent Operational Envelope," which defines the certification boundary through permissions, domain constraints, safety properties, governance rules, and autonomy levels; an automated pipeline that converts ontology data into regulatory, operational, and adversarial test scenarios; and a "Trust Certificate" featuring machine-verifiable attestations with tiered deployment outcomes (Approved, Conditional, or Rejected).

We conducted a controlled pilot involving five industry-by-regulatory-regime cells across the United States and Vietnam, spanning four highly regulated sectors: Fintech, Banking, Insurance, and Healthcare. This study evaluated 1,800 scenarios against 125 primary-source regulatory requirements and 25 injected faults. The results demonstrated that ontology-grounded generation (G4) achieved a regulatory coverage of 48.3%, significantly outperforming the persona-based baseline’s 33.1% (corrected p = .0006) and yielding the highest domain specificity score of 4.77/5.0 (p = 2e-6). However, this coverage advantage over both the baseline and retrieval-augmented prompting methods did not remain statistically robust after applying Bonferroni correction. These findings were replicated through cross-validation across three LLM families—Claude Sonnet 4, Qwen 2.5 72B, and Gemma 4 26B—using a total of 5,400 scenarios, which reaffirmed the superiority of the ontology approach over persona-based methods. Ultimately, the study establishes ontology-grounded scenario generation as a reliable supplement to persona-based test suites, particularly for domains with intensive regulatory demands.


Source: arXiv Generated at: 2026-06-04 00:00:00 UTC

Related Articles

TechCrunch

A burglar used a Waymo to steal yoga clothes in San Francisco — and got away with it

A thief stole yoga clothes using a Waymo, but police failed to catch them because the car’s video data was deleted and b...

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon on the Coming Mega IPOs
Bloomberg

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon on the Coming Mega IPOs

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon anticipates a surge in major IPOs, signaling renewed market confidence and significant o...

What Are A.I. Agents Actually Doing?
New York Times

What Are A.I. Agents Actually Doing?

Arena research shows tech professionals are most likely to use AI agents at work, highlighting a strong industry trend i...

TechCrunch

Cash App launches a wand for tap-and-pay

Cash App launched a $25 NFC "Magic Wand" for tap-and-pay, blending viral novelty with practical contactless payments. It...

Databricks CEO Plans to Avoid IPO During Year of Huge Offerings
Bloomberg

Databricks CEO Plans to Avoid IPO During Year of Huge Offerings

Databricks CEO plans to avoid an IPO in 2021, despite a surge in public offerings. This contrasts with earlier reports t...

TechCrunch

Waymo’s spent robotaxi batteries will be used as grid storage

Waymo partners with B2U to repurpose retired robotaxi batteries for grid storage in California and Texas, aligning with ...